Tattooed and ringless
One thing I don't do on this blog is talk about my health.
Too personal and so excruciatingly boring, I wouldn't do that to my dear readers.
Today is no exception.
However.
I must tell you what I saw on a recent visit to a doctor's office.
It pains me to reveal this but the physician to whom I refer is an OB/GYN.
No, I am not sick and no, I am not with child. This was purely routine. But thank you for your concern.
The only reason I give you that tidbit is if I leave out the rather personal part -- i.e., that I was seeing a gynecologist -- the other part won't make any sense.
So I'll bite the bullet.
The thing is, I was obliged to cool my heels in the waiting room twice that day -- each time for at least twenty minutes -- so I got to do a great deal of watching.
Oh, I jotted a few things down in the journal I always keep with me, and I flipped through a People magazine, but mostly I observed the comings and goings of ... real people.
Not in a judgemental way. In an interested way.
But, as it turned out, in a sad -- and eventually exasperated -- way too.
Because of all the expectant mothers and new mothers who trooped in and out of the waiting room, most accompanied by what I had to assume were the fathers of their offspring, I couldn't help but notice.
They all had tattoos but not one of them had a wedding ring. At least, not that they were wearing.
The abundance of tattoos and severe paucity of rings applied to both genders.
In other words, I don't think the ringlessness on the part of the mommies was attributable to swollen summer-pregnancy digits.
I think we must face the fact that very few -- if any -- of the couples were actually married.
Meaning, they all had the time, money, and inclination to get "inked" -- many times over -- and, as the bulging bellies and rattle-festooned infant carriers attested, they all had the time and apparently the inclination to make a baby.
But no time, money, or inclination to engage in matrimony.
Now about those tattoos.
What in the name of all that is holy is it about the expanse of skin constituting the outside of a person's leg between the knee and the ankle that begs to be covered with a lurid, writhing tattoo?
I am only asking. Because yes, it baffles me. Nearly every leg that walked by in that waiting room featured a massive work of ink.
This tattoo thing started small in the general population. I seem to remember twenty years ago, people beginning to get itty-bitty hearts and butterflies and maybe a shamrock or a teensy fairy here and there.
A shoulder, an ankle, what have you.
Now? Huge grotty dark shapes and forms, faces and words, symbols and signs, vines and leaves, bloom grotesquely over entire backs and down arms and up legs and around necks and across bosoms and the Lord above only knows where else.
I tire greatly of it. I'm sick to death of seeing it, if you must know.
I remember the mind-numbing hours I spent in the waiting room of the doctor who delivered all four of our children.
I do not recall that great numbers of babydaddies swelled the ranks of we mommies who whiled away entire afternoons because Dr. Chung was across the street at the hospital, delivering a bundle of joy, his appointments lagging more and more behind.
In fact, I cannot remember any. Fathers in the waiting room, that is. Oh, I'm sure there were one or two over the ten years I was having children but it was definitely not a normal occurrence.
TG, my husband and the father of my children, never accompanied me to a single OB appointment. For one thing, he was working. For another, I didn't need him trailing after me every minute of the day.
And at least ninety-five percent of the expectant and new mothers waiting with me wore wedding rings. As in, they were married women.
None of us had a tattoo. I for one never will and nobody who calls me mama had better ever come home with one either.
I'm sorry if that offends someone. Allow me to remind you that you click out the same way you clicked in. This is not Disney World and I am not the Easter Bunny.
But I liked those days. We were better off. People for the most part still got married before they had kids. You almost never saw anybody "inked" unless they'd been a Navy man or something, which was fine.
The occasional anchor on a bicep I can handle. I can even tolerate Johnny Depp having his mother's name tattooed on his arm and his daughter's name inked across his chest above his heart. Pirate!
But even that boy has gone too far.
What America needs is fewer tattoos and more wedding rings.
I imagine there are children who are scared out of their wits by some of the gruesome images stamped on the skin of adults in their lives. That's a crying shame. It's not normal and it's not intelligent. In fact it's decidedly low-rent.
Little kids need a mommy and daddy who are not "committed" or "in a relationship" but who are actually married to one another.
In case you don't get my drift, I mean one man and one woman. Yeah, in addition to being opinionated I'm traditional and narrow-minded.
Deal with it.
The next time people see an inking establishment they should just walk on by. Please spare the rest of us having to look at yet another stupid tattoo.
And that is all for now.
=0=0=0=
Happy Tuesday